Copyright by Akron Edition GmbH

Akron Edition GmbH, Ruhberg 20. CH – 9000 St.Gallen

www.akron.de

Layout, setting and frontdesign:

Mediaagency Holger Kliemannel

gestaltung@roterdrache.org

Titelpicture & Illustrations: Patricia Cooney

1. digital edition: Zeilenwert GmbH 2013

All rights reserved

The publication, multiplication and reproduction of this book or parts of it without the signed permission of the editors is strictly prohibited

ISBN 9783905372502

Table of Contents

Cover

Title

Copyright

Introduction

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 1. Our World

The models of reality

Conversations with the old Magician

The Relativity of our Models

a) General questions concerning our worldview

b) Specific questions referring to higher realizations and human models

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 2. Time

The psychological perception and memory of time

Conversations with the old Magician

Is Time seen from a spiritual Point of View an Illusion?

a) General questions and an exemplary case concerning the matter of time

b) Magical practices The practical transformation of matter through the intervention of the saved time within our psyche

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 3. Dreams

The mutual penetration of the world of dreams and reality

Conversations with the old Magician

Is the human Being able to venture beyond the Borders of his physical Existence?

a) General questions concerning dreams and other conditions of consciousness

b) Memorandum from June 1984 The mutual interception of dreams and our everyday life

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 4. Chaos

Physical and psychological illnesses

Conversations with the old Magician

Are severe Diseases a Result from the Conditions of our Soul?

a) General questions concerning physical and psychological illnesses

b) Magical intentions for the improvement of our physical disposition

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 5. Daemons

Traumatic separations from parts of our personality

Conversations with the old Magician

The Phenomenon of separated Personality-Fractions: Are Daemons the energetic Animation of psychological Disorders?

a) General questions concerning traumatic separations of the personality

b) The memory of the birth of a child-daemon

c) The curse of our ancestors

d) Further examples concerning the matter of ancestral-daemons

e) Cancer in form of an energetic embodiment of unsolved problems

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 6. Avalon

Angels and other higher entities

Conversations with the old Magician

Do higher Entities exist?

a) General questions concerning beings from other spheres

b) Further thoughts on techniques to transfer personalities or other forms of energetic transmissions

The Seven Portals of the Spirit 7. Mankind

The secret of life

The „Black Forest Gateau“-Model

Conversations with the old Magician

What about other Spheres of Consciousness?

a) The cake-model – A summary

b) Further thoughts concerning encounters with other dimensions

c) Quantum leaps through time and space

∞ The Mage The End is the Beginning

Dialogue with the inner Warden

The echo from a hidden world

Introduction

These notes are no spiritual guide in a common sense. It is not made for people searching for the truth without the ability for self-doubt. Neither does it help anyone who is literally hunting for new realizations by devouring every piece of literature that promises to provide them with new intellectual models. Being a mental explosive charge under the fundament of all kinds of transported realizations this script shows a critical point of view towards the common belief that there is no realization for the individual but one out of the variety of collective images and inventories that would provide the personality with its own ideas. After all we are not what we believe to be. Everyone believes to be that what distinguishes him or her from others – the self-image he has been stamped with by his environment. Though that what we express towards the outside world is only a fraction of our true nature. Because: The search for the truth can not be accomplished with the help of the normal dual thinking – The hindrance which is preventing us from reaching our goals is situated in the dual way of our material perception. That is why the occurring magical question is: ”How can I become conscious of what I am forced to be?” Only when I have found out about this will I truly understand who I am.

Let us have a look into the future: With the progressing development of our growing, interlinked system of communication the number of people that are looking upon our common values with a questioning attitude is also growing rapidly. Still, for many people it is not possible any more to exclusively identify themselves with the destinations that are valued by our society of intellectual knowledge and digital information, and that is what makes them become outcasts because they are too conscious about who they are: Over-individualized creatures that are also existing in other worlds and dimensions. Gradually the truth is coming to light: The Self-image we are familiar with is only a small extract out of our “existence”, which we can express on the stage of our personality. This means that every one of us has access to the hidden deeper realms of our soul, which can inspire us to venture beyond the borders of our three-dimensional reality. That is why it is not really about abandoning our attitude towards the way we see the world but it is about expanding our stage of life. And it is about turning our sight through which we perceive the world to the inside, if we truly want to understand who we are.

That is the reason why it is not our intention to attack the models of our society, the intention is to show alternatives for individuals who are not able to identify themselves with the archetypes our society is supporting, that is to say they cannot integrate themselves into the common roles: namely people who are not content to live with clichés like family, career or social wealth, but are intensively dealing with the question of what makes life worth living beyond the values we have learned to accept. And of course it is about giving a reason why it is dangerous to express such a point of view. Maybe it is then, when we finally realize the necessity to preserve the illusionary images of society, because otherwise everything would collapse and that would lead to the honest conclusion: “Only the one who knows the basis of our material models is able to find the answers that would help to free himself from these collective structures in the right moment.”

There still is another way: To overcome our dual thinking-structures we have to set out from these collective systems of values because we need a fundament on which we can place the starting point from which we set out on our journey through the oceans of night. From here on we venture into the depths of our inner worlds, because the way our domesticated senses help us to perceive our self created world-image, and that is how our inner sight can dive into our subconscious longings. Through the change of the position of our inner spectator we can stalk into the deep, because only when we reach below the threshold of our consciousness we can find out about the way we are at home on many different spheres simultaneously. Beyond our dreams we travel in spaces of experience that are so unbelievably different to anything we know that this knowledge, should it come to see the light, of our reality would put our material world into danger. That is why it is understandable that it has to be locked away from normal people under the cover of consciousness because all spiritual realizations point back to the tools of intellectual embossing: “The intellect of the human form is always putting itself into scenery within knowledge!”

Still this is not enough for the abstract thinker. For him it is important to fuse with this eternal part deep within and outside of himself again, which reaches far through the different spheres beyond any form of social cultures. Because this inner existence does not receive its self-consciousness from the values out of our education, it does not change when the world is moving on. It is itself part of every change and bursts the limits of every individual self-image, for it embodies a kind of over-individualised more-dimensional consciousness. In one word: Eternity is the destination! But this includes a price that every searching individual has to pay: He has to change himself if he wants to change his point of view, he has to expand himself to recollect all of his invisible parts and reunite with them within himself and integrate them into his reality he first of all has to understand to its full extend so he can in the end leave it without leaving parts of his soul behind.

St.Gallen, Ruhberg

The last day of the year 2010

The Seven Portals of the Spirit
1. Our World
The models of reality

Primarily this is about the question of what is actually the essence of our world: Is this world really what it seems to be in our eyes? Or is our perception of the world only the result of an collective world image, the essence of the current public opinion of our collectively educated imagination that we pass on to each other.

Let us go back to our childhood: Was it not the case that our parents were the first ones that told us how we where to perceive the world; a mystically shining point of light proved to be just a normal ashtray made of glass that father is using to get rid of his cigarettes. The whole mystical world full of magic was reduced to its functionality. Therefore every object has lost its magic within its mysterious atmosphere, which we were able to see when we where children, and was shrunk to its function that was determined by the grown up persons. And so we slowly grew into the normal world the way human beings see it. And the more we where able to convince the elders that we see the world exactly the way they do the more praise and applause we where assured to receive. When we grew older the grown ups projected their religious images onto us. We where told how this world came into being and what the aims and the sense of human existence are. Because our infantile “hard disk” was still empty, we where thankful to receive the first terminologies with which we could explore and perceive the outer world with our educated imagination. Because the concept that has been passed on from generation to generation is the only benchmark after which we could experience reality, the lessons in life had the supporting side effect that the world showed itself to us exactly the way we learned to perceive it. At this point we had no idea that there would be no other possibility to experience the world in a different way. On the other hand we can learn how difficult it is to change the familial or religious background from the point of view we have today because they are so deep within ourselves that we cannot see them just like the famous “blind spot”.

What can we realize?

That is why it is important to keep in mind that our educated perception is after all a construction that ensures our social coexistence with our fellow beings. In an overcrowded, highly differenced world that has already left behind all natural resources, a natural and healthy survival is not possible any more. Our economical system is a rambling, cancerous ulcer that can only keep its balance through perpetual growth. Our complex society could not afford its national product without virtual needs that ensure the life standard of its consuming clients. The world would stand still in one moment if we would not accept – would it be only for a moment – the functionality of the banks, the money-systems or the human images and imaginations. If we would question the very basis we stand upon we would loose the ground on which we can base our existence: The world would dissolve in front of our eyes or it would break apart like a dried piece of cake.

On the other hand crisis is always a necessary part of development. It is the coming forth of a development that lies within humanity itself and that one could describe with fear and greed. The international network in the era of the internet has anticipated this process and it is not the duty of mankind to learn from it. As cynical as it may sound, that would stop the progress. Human development was never based on following its own tracks backward, on reversal or on returning but it always lies within the fact that the solutions for the problems of today are the problems of tomorrow, which yet again require the solutions for the day after tomorrow. That is important to know if we want to look forward to the future with a relaxed attitude: There is no paradise to be found for us nor is there salvation that could make us happy. There are only goals that embody the illusions that tell us that we would one day be happy should we be able to achieve them, because happy people are not willing to fulfil the preconditions of a steadily growing environment in progress. Because, should the human being would stop his urge to grow, everything would collapse. That is to say: We are forced to focus on a paradise that we are constantly trying to reach without noticing that it would be the end of our system if we would find it.

The subliminal mechanisms of our social models

That is why we have to realize that the achievements that precondition improvement and preservation for our life-standard are the very ones that at the same time undermine and destroy them. It is said that every crisis is initiated by mankind, but this statement is not precise: Crisis’s are initiated by the inventories and systems that have been programmed into the human mind and through the human urge to realize these inventories and models. Self-appointed teachers and policemen often fail to realize that they set the preconditions for further injustice by trying to avoid or avenge it. By fighting the so called “evil” they chase “evil within the others” instead of their own negative and destructive potential. Through this they reach the top of subconscious self-confusion. The shadow is hiding from itself by destroying the projected image of its own evil within the wrongs of the other, through which it is convincing itself from the “wrong” solution. For it is always human struggle that is yearning for freedom and completeness while being held captive within the chains of matter and it is mostly ending up in a condition of deep imbalance which is generally called “hell” by our religious tradition.

Still, these models are not only useful, they are also the only way to counter our subjective blindness at least with an objective short-sightedness, and that is not only the first but also the most important step on the path of wisdom. We can only analyse ourselves through the intellect but because we can only see the world the way we experience it through thinking we have to become an image of our thinking first of all – and for this we need models. Basically models are for binding our thoughts to a focus, so that we can have a common basis when we communicate with others and philosophize with them. If we were smart we would realize that the truth can not be enforced through thinking because the only thing that can be seen through thinking is thinking itself, in a way that what we have chosen to be the measure for itself. If we can keep that in mind we can use the models to explore our psyche, but not through realizing the truth but through becoming conscious about the individual way we are fixed to models. And how we adapt ourselves to the collective description of the world – we have no other choice.

Self-destructive acting as a way to reach development

Let us summarize this: Being a human being we are a form of existence that can only grow through painful experiences and a generous spirit has gifted us with the ability to grow regardless of how painful the loss or how big the catastrophe is. Only if a malicious daemon would persuade us to find out about the real material and spiritual fundament that we stand upon. All would collapse as we grovel in the collective madness of virtual shit. We are so helplessly interwoven with our models and structures that we would go down with them if we questioned them, that is why we don’t accept any questioning of our concept. We are forced to lie in order to keep everything functioning. We have to pretend that we don’t know anything about this so that our engine wouldn’t start stammering. The best thing about human development is the fact that the sceneries will always balance. That is why even self destruction is seen from the point of view of eternity not only a failure but also an advance for mankind.

Conversations with the old Magician
The Relativity of our Models
a) General questions concerning our worldview

How would you define magic or the deeper meaning of life? The aim that is important for the spiritual maturity of mankind?

In my opinion magic is the attempt to break through the borders with which our collectively integrated vision of the world has burdened us. The deeper meaning in life is to analyze the preconditions for the force that constrains us to constantly remain captured within the borders of our consciousness. In a word: The main concern is to overcome reality in order to, at least, loosen the blinkers that demarcate the perspective through which we see the reality we have been „fed“.

To overcome reality? What does „reality“mean seen from a magical point of view?

Reality is a double-edged sword: On the one hand it is a necessary tool that, more or less, preserves a harmonic interaction between human beings, on the other it is a kind of prison, in which we hold ourselves captive reciprocatively. We created this prison by ourselves, in a sense, in order to set up the conditions for a system in which we can communicate and simultaneously protect ourselves from our fears and the irritations of our subconsciousness. One could also say: Reality is the first layer of a black forest cake, which we are going to talk about later, that contains the social inventory of our civilization. It is only a thin sugar-coating on the pyramid of human evolution, and without it, the instinctive nature of mankind would be brought back to light, anarchy or the privilege of the stronger, as is exemplified in the total breakdown of order when cities that are haunted by natural disasters like earthquakes or floods – portraying the fundament of the human construction plan.

So it is that what protects human society that simultaneously prevents the development of the individual?

Evolution is an instrument of general balance without mercy and doesn’t purchase the spiritual goal of the enlightened, but always the most direct solution for the development of everything in the plan of nature. For this reason one should not observe reality from the perspective of the individual, but from nations and races in their entirety.

And who is the creator of this reality?

We are, but, well, unaware of it! We have constructed our material conditions under the influence of our sensory perception preconditioning the frame of the image in which the outside world is illustrated – this is an ancient act of balance and development that continues endlessly. If we look at it the other way around it is also the self-made structure of the outside that influences our sensory perception – we recognize it inside our own graven images, that suddenly usurp a collective energy field and can be used by the old bondholders of power as well as the new rulers.

You mean the act of creating our reality was – so to speak – the forbearer of human magic?

Yes. Our ego is the materialization of what we think ourselves to be and reality is – if not the creation communal – then at least the collective preservation of a traditional culture, that we constantly assimilate to the spirit of time. We are not the makers of the universe, but we all are the creators of our own, personal world, that is inseparably connected to the collective world in the shape as was spoon-fed into our minds.

Is it not possible to escape this dual reality?

More or less, yes, for nothing that we do is carved in stone – procedures change constantly and yet again every change influences the specific action. Admittedly, there are very few that catch the train, because they don’t know where they should escape to – because they tied themselves to this reality for a lifetime and made it the foundation of their whole existence. They are going in circles, because they have not learned at which point to jump of the carrousel. The spiritually experimentative person can flee it though, if he learns to silence the inner dialogue by consciously emptying his mind, cut off the stream of thoughts, which forces him to perpetually perceive the world in the shape of the structures that were pressed into his consciousness – at least for the period of time he is in a condition of silent thoughts or inhabits other spheres of consciousness.

According to that, reality cannot be objective?

Reality is the most objective dimension of thought we are able to construct after our image. The growing person that observes the world through his not yet developed and educated senses quickly learns to assimilate the collective images of his ancestors in a way that he can draw from them the optimal number of advantages for his life.

If I understand you correctly the general doings of humanity are reduced to simply administrating their only reality imparted through education?

They are not only administrating it, they are also developing it, at least as far as the conditions of their feigned structures allow them to do so. Although the normal human being has very little possibilities to influence these collective mechanisms individually, because those collective streams are accompanied with such an intensive collective force that the pressure of its flood always pushes away everything that holds against it.

But what drives us? What is trying to reach itself within us, so our fate can fulfil itself?

At first sight it is our superstitious ambitions that urge us – but behind that there is a silent force that is always desirous to balance the inner disharmony that indwells us. It originates in our social models and familial structures that coined us in our childhood. We are not free at heart – all the aims we pursue in the outside world are a never-ending attempt to compensate the inner deficit through a specific action in the material world. But we have the chance to grow if we bravely move forward and realise the greater connections, shoulder responsibility, and know that the things we do are not always good, but the best possible seen from the individual point of view.

What about our social ambitions? Are they wrong?

They are only wrong when we believe that they are right. Our social values mirror the game humanity plays and the fact that it invents certain rules in order to have something that they can occupy themselves with while living. Common morals are nothing but a collective self-occupation-therapy, so that human beings can perform their anarchistic nature on a controlled stage.

Why then all this stress, all this war and anxiety in the world?

Because our view is so narrow and dual. No one goes to war just fore the sake of war, no, we fight against each other, because the other one is always wrong and one is anxious to persuade the other one of the own justified demands. If it is necessary to enforce ones postulations, one has to use war, which of course never results from the own injustice, but from the unapologetic attitude of the other. The universal frequency is an impersonal force, neither good nor bad. Only the mechanisms of our consciousness paint them „black“ or „white“. The differentiation happens consequently in our central nervous system, in our thoughts. The former, negative descriptions of destructive forces mirror nothing else but the own, subconscious demons of mankind. The world is a mirror, in whose reflection we see the image of the others overlapped by our own demons, for which we are blind to recognize them ourselves.

Blind? But evil exists in this world – does it not?

Yes, but only because we do not know the deeper coherences of evil. Evil is mostly being constructed by numerous negative experiences, which in turn feed on personal disappointments. These disappointments result from negative experiences, from which we perceive only the mistakes of the others – not our own expectations.

Do you mean we can only see errors within the others?

Generally we do, yes.

That doesn’t sound very comforting! Where could be the solution?

We may not expect any solution to come from the outside, but we have to find it within ourselves. It is always most important to create ones own point of reference regardless of ones position, which is giving us the possibility to watch our actions from the outside point. Then we will realize very soon that a solution is not necessarily needed.

Why don’t we need a solution?

Because we are always a part of the solution! The problem is only the shadow of the resulting realization: We always see from our own perspective, the point from which we create our problems ourselves, because seen through the eyes of eternity our problems do not even exist ...

... and where does the problem exist then?

Nowhere. Every mistake is nothing but the retrospective of a realization, and the sense of all this lies within the strength not to root oneself to the position of the mistake. In other words: Mistakes are only the nebulosity of material systems, that wouldn’t exist without points of reference. Seen from a spiritual point of view they are nothing but a direction sign to realizations, helping us to perceive the operating forces of evolution, that normally are not perceptible through material thinking.

You think that injustice will remain in this world as long as we are only able to see it in others and never within ourselves?

Yes. Only the one who knows his own shadow, knows who he really is. And only the one who knows himself can conceive what it means to evolve from within oneself. For we do not only walk the tight-rope over the abyss, we are also the crocodiles lingering in the bleary waters who eat the ones who lost their balance. At least until we recognize the fact that the sinners are one part of ourselves and the crocodiles resemble the other part of the same existence.

But what about world piece?

The quest for paradise must remain an unfulfilled longing otherwise the human race has no ambition for development.

What ...? Why can’t the human race develop in piece and harmony?

A static paradise doesn’t offer enough foundations for the human ego to evolve, and therefore peace is never possible. Humanity needs war with the prospect of piece or perpetual crisis that includes the hope for paradise, which of course may not fulfil itself, so that it can serve as fundamental motivation for development.

Well I don’t know ... this sounds really brutal. Somehow I miss the term “Freedom”? What about our own, free will?

We have the freedom to do exactly that what vibrates within the collective frequency of the actual collective energy field of time, in a manner of speaking to implement a socially imprinted image of freedom within contracted, personal possibilities. It is always about “doing what has to be done”, like even Goethe knew already before our time. If we fulfil this aspiration, we perceive what leads to a conceived image of freedom.

Where does the final destination beyond our social and material aims lie?

Our origins lie within the spirit of the universe, within the unknown, and we came here to evolve – to learn about the laws of change within matter – This is about learning in what way we influence our world – To create the conditions under which we can change our reality, so we can understand the way our intellect is working. Only then can we realize that we are the ones who have to change if we want to improve the world.

b) Specific questions referring to higher realizations and human models

What do you think about the Christian image of God?

As long as we are not searching for this God deep within ourselves or in our memories but inside religious scripts, we should restrict our approach to the historical perspective of an anthropologist. Every human being hides the memory of the source of creation within his consciousness, the spiritual flame into which he wants to return. It is the longing for paradise that we repress in the course of our lives, the will to return into the blessed land, in which human beings construct their gods. Behind this however does not hide the fusion with, – and the return to – the divine origins but the egoistic claim to evolve from within oneself in a creative way and, in a sense, be godlike. The resulting conclusion is obvious: These images divert from reality – this collective God cannot help us, on the contrary, he strengthens and patronizes us in our illusion ...

... a divine phantom that – in a way – bites its own bottom?

God is an image, thought up by priests, which helps us to deal with the results of our own acquisitions. Somehow this is about assigning ourselves to the task that helps us to find God or the meaning of life within the consequences of our deeds. That is why this picture always points back to it’s creator: Humanity …

You think that mankind has created God after their example?

Sure, because we only ever see what we want to see, and we perceive everything in the world exactly the same way our collectively minted consciousness forces us to interpret the things we see, to prevent them from transgressing the borders of our common perception. Even worse: We only see the association with our collective thinking-structures, which we have evoked from within our cradle and since then differentiated and cultivated, confirmed by everything. Actually everything we see is nothing else but a brew mixed by electric impulses in our brain, that force us to relate to something so that we at least have two points between which we can navigate inside of his mechanisms. Just imagine our inner position from where we perceive the world, would displace itself, then the whole attention towards our reality would collapse, and then our whole civilization would vanish instantly.

But where is the origin of the impulse that causes the need to create such an image?

Within the collective intention itself! We form realities from within our spiritual force and our common imagination, in which we interact and therefore there’s need of an origin to which we can relate within our dual conception, so that we are not able to notice that all our images flow from within ourselves and we name this origin „God“. That’s the trick …

... the God-trick?

The collective intention is the impulse, to construct a reachable symbol from the fathomless numinous creation and place this self-created image like a mirror in front of us so that we can believe in it.

Does that mean that humanity is its own creator?

You are absolutely right! The first human beings had to – in a manner of speaking – invent their civilization first and the question, how this world could have come into being, helped them to find the answer, in the way they observed it. Our own assessment of this world out there in turn influenced the image they created from themselves, because we can only feel ourselves through our intuition, which is again initiated from the outside world. And through this perpetual interaction between the self-image and the outside world, they constructed their personal history.

The self image that reveals itself to us in our mirror helps us to trust the God who is looking back at us through the reflection?

Yes. As long as we do not realize that we ourselves are the ones who create the inventories of our symbolisms, we can not be able to see the fact that we in a way have become the filling of our own perception, and on this belief we can depend on. We see ourselves standing at the windows of our cerebrum staring out at the world through our eyes, but what we see is actually nothing else than a kind of formatted landscape out of our collective inventory.

Did I understand you correctly? The all-embracing frame which holds everything together is our faith?

To define this picture as what we want it to be a frame is necessary, and this frame consists of the many individual egos, through which we force each other to keep this self created image together.

And why do we have to keep this image together? Would the world break apart if we didn’t?

It is not the world that would break apart without a frame, for such a world could never have existed. It is the construction of our ego that always builds a controlled reality, which would collapse if we would suddenly have the idea of not believing in our self constructed world image any more.

Then our models would be nothing but a farce …?

In a sense, yes. Because we don’t know that reality on the outside in the way we know it was created by our collective creativity, so we could have something within our consciousness that we constructed, which we are able to control and therefore we really believe that the outer world is completely autonomous from our inner perception ...

... and every form of searching for God is a joke?

At least one that is to be taken very seriously, for this God is in fact the self-made life-goal of humanity within our minds! Let us go back in time: At the very beginning of mankind there was no God – just a few tools of consciousness, which variated us from animals and using them we were to carve our worldview out of eternity. This wish we have fulfilled ourselves, for these self fulfilled wishes are the foundation of that what we relate to and we have expanded them into gigantic cathedrals of knowledge within which those billions of priests and scientists are busy constantly confirming and explain our monuments. Our whole progress is nothing but a development of images that we ourselves have constructed and which fulfill themselves within the collective capacity of consciousness.

But what about spiritual realization? And where would be the solution?

Maybe this is all about simply accepting the fact that the way we suffer when we proceed with the endless conflict we have with each other, is the price we have to pay for wanting to control our lives. There is no return from this hamster-wheel. Therefore there’s no point in the question what would be if it all were different. Maybe we should ask ourselves the following question: “How should we understand the problems in our world as long as we fail to notice that these problems lie within ourselves?”

So, there is no paradise?

What for? Paradise is nothing worth achieving for a human nature, foreseen from the perspective of our ego, there is nothing to strife for. Human evolution originates in social and civil control, to let the natural instincts be accompanied by a socialized pendant, and this control is the framework around which the structure of every civilization winds itself – and collapses from time to time. Therefore it makes no sense for the magical person to repress or overcome control, he rather has to study the social mechanisms closely and ask the price one has to pay for this control. Like I said before: There is no escape from this dual trap. These delusions always lead to destruction and total breakdowns, onto which new orders install themselves. This is the fundament of human development.

What about higher ambitions that human beings long for? Don’t we need a specific aim ... a deeper truth?

As long as we perpetually try to enforce clarity we are delivered victims to the force of our intellect. For as long as our intellect is only able to perceive life through the limited forms and shapes within the dimensions of our common way of perception which he can comprehend, the strife for clarity or a deeper truth is, seen from an objective point of view, the illusion to prefer our imagination to eternity and believe in it. That is why every kind of clarity is threatening to our existence, for it observes and verifies only small fractions out of a whole, isolates them and evaluates them as if they were everything. Our „controlled“ models are a trick that only works because we don’t see through it.

Why do human beings even need models?

Because we are only able to see the world the way we experience it through our structures of thought, we first of all have to get an impression of our way of thinking. Actually models are for collecting our focused thoughts around one center so that we have a common foundation that is the precondition for every kind of interaction, in a manner of speaking, a description of the world, so that we can have philosophic conversations about it …

I understand ... models that sustain reality are actually diverting from what is real?

If we were clever, we would realize that truth cannot be enforced by means of our intellect, because all that is perceivable through thinking is thinking itself, which is the very aspect we have chosen to be our major criterion, to measure itself. If we want to convince our intellect, we have to create models first that convince our thinking, and then we have to forget that we ourselves have constructed these models. That is why we may not expect any truth of these models because truth lies beyond the duality of consciousness. It is not our task to enforce a „model of truth“ but to accept that we are never able to see the truth with what our consciousness is equipped with.

According to your words every model would be an illusion that is essential for life?

Indeed: Without these structures mankind would have nothing to hold on to because as I already told you: The only thing that is perceivable through thinking is thinking itself, but these realizations only lead us to new models. Do you want to know more about this?

I want to know everything!

Every model enacts of its own, inner daemon, an energetic existence created within the model through spiritual laws that radiates negative frequencies onto beings that are not of the same opinion and keeps us captured within the specific force field. We know this concept from science, politics, religion and esoteric. The very moment a human being has understood his model he is trying to try it out on someone else’s life. Models create a collective energy, which is controllable and confirmable by accessory input from the outside. Behind this lies the egoistic intention to transform life into a generally valid structure.

This system seems familiar to me ... is there no alternative?

There is nothing beyond our structures, because these different models which mankind has created for itself in the course of history are the only path evolution will take.

Where is this path leading to?

Reality is an accumulation of conceptions – depending on the cultural sources from which mankind draws its reality. All in all this means: Models are the only instruments that are able to hold an objective lie against our subjective wickedness and this is not only the first step on the path of wisdom but it is also the most important one.

So, are we back at the good, old religion then?

All spiritual, religious, magical and esoteric models are something like a consequence of our material world. They embody the materialization of the repressed longing of the world to explain the universe from deep within and not only superficially, that is: like the human mind „imagines“ the higher goals. Have we realized this, we are ready to take our first step into the world of magic …

... first step where to? What can we do?

Nothing. It is doing it all by itself. But while doing nothing we can become conscious of certain things …

... what things?

Should we not, for example, stop looking for the devil on the outside? Through this we could prevent a good deal of suffering – because he indwells us! You yourself are your worst enemy! It is our shadow and it wants to kill us!

It wants to destroy us? I do not understand!

The devil is the separated part of humanity – and he exists in each and every one of us! As long as we know this we can rest at ease …

Rest at ease ...?

Everything we are desirous to achieve is determined by what is trying to be accomplished through and within us, so our fate can fulfill itself. This is the final realization on our path to redemption. If we knew that there never is anything to realize which is not already enclosed deep within ourselves, there would be no motive for personal development.

But when the devil indwells us?

Don’t worry – So do the Gods! Look: We are our parent’s children and our parents are their parents children, who yet again are children of their parents etc. This implies, that every one of us is related to the first human being, to the first ape, originated from the first prehistoric organic form of life – and even further back – to the very origin of creation. In other words: We include the whole universe and therefore the force of creation is a part of us. Unfortunately we lost the access to our inner power, which would let us share in the cosmic conception. That is why we have no choice but to addict ourselves to this self-made God, who kindly smiles at us from every religious institution of power, rampantly growing financial system, exaggerated constructions of prosperity and scientific explanation of spiritual topics and technological achievements ...

We have no other choice ...? What do you mean by that?

Without the systems that lead us away from spirituality and force materialism upon us in exchange, we wouldn’t be able to live at all. It is this ambivalence which frightens us so much because it mirrors our own constructed way of living. The financial markets are the most intensive shadow of the modern development, within which humanity becomes a helpless victim to its own creation. On the other hand we may not be self-pitying: We integrated this daemon into our world ourselves. Eventually it seems to be the destiny of mankind, the path that seems predetermined by the way it was constructed by evolution; therefore he will never truly find peace. And because we don’t want to be forced to confront ourselves with this truth, we constructed our religion, which diverts us from reality. What is the conclusion which we draw from this: Everything is alright, there’s no need to worry, at least as long as we are not yet confronted with our mortality or lie on our deathbed!

What would be different if we knew this?

If mankind would know the subliminal connections? The whole world would break apart from one moment to the next, because these structures are only able to exist because of our common agreement that we cannot depend on them without our control. If we further knew that it is our own control that holds this whole construction together, which yet again is the reason why we can depend on them, as long as our control mechanisms are functioning well, we can also experience that everything we believe in is nothing else then believing in our belief.

Could one not say that nothing would function without our faith ...?

We could even symbolically say that the path underneath our feet only exists, as long as our trust in the belief that this path is real, functions ...

And that we are only playing parts in our own movie?

We are not only playing the parts we are also the directors. The part of us that indwells higher spheres provides the stage on which we are not only able to orchestrate our ego but also the indescribable parts of ourselves like a director would – I shall return to this topic later. This director controls and changes the role-play and fits the ego into the reality of its environment so that the person can function within his or her life.

Who is this director?

C. G. Jung called it „self“ and defined it to be the final destination and source of our personal will, in the end a transcendent and unrecognizable inner core that simultaneously describes center and periphery.

And who is this „self“?

I can only explain it to you symbolically: “Our-self” is the will of the archer to hit the center of his target, before he actually shoots his arrow.

Why then have we not exchanged this faith of ours with a deeper, spiritual knowledge long ago? Why did we hold on to our religion for so long?

To provide the motivation to seek the meaning of life! If we knew that there is nothing to look for, that nothing matters and everything is harmonic and good the way it is, there would be no differences between us that would allow us to feel different from others and then all our goals wouldn’t make any sense.

Shouldn’t we then finally bury this old, patriarchal God of ours?

But he died long ago! These days we meet the modern separated part of his personality in the temples of science. He resembles a kind of glue which binds the collective associations of humanity onto one, firm point of reference, a founding axiom – one could call it Aristotelian thinking –, from which the whole world is measurable from behind and controllable in the front. The modern wardens of the Holy Grail, operating within their fortresses are in no way less diabolic than the old priests. They are equally addicted to their religious hubris and in their rapture they preoccupy themselves with either decoding our past using highly complicated statistics and spreadsheets of human calculation, or deliberately interfering with our gene – structures with the help of molecular-biology.

Most people think differently about this – You are no fan of science?

Most of all, I am no fan of arrogance. Mankind has a tendency to centralize its achievements and science has a tendency to proclaim its realizations the hub of the world. Thereby we shouldn’t restrict our researches to a horizontal perspective, we should most of all, fathom what lies in the deep which is to say we should not only want to find out how much we can find out, but also have the ambition to analyze the reason why we feel forced to find an answer to every question that occurs from the outside. Why do we not also try to explore our inner spheres because in the end we are all mortal beings and no scientific achievement can prevent us from facing death one day!

You were talking about changes of perspectives within our consciousness that are linked to the morphisms of inner spheres once in a while. Is death one of these changes even though it is a final one?

Seen from a spiritual perspective death is totally insignificant and is not spectacularly different from our journeys within our dreams our conditions of deep meditation if we change our view from the point of common frequencies of thought onto a higher dimension. He merely changes the possibility to return into the physical, material world and destroys – at least from our point of view – the illusion that this reality is the only form of existence. It is the same the other way around: Just as we have no idea about dimensions of existence beyond our consciousness, many beings on other spheres have no inventory about what a human being or a soul could be.

What about the enlightened ones, who already know about all of this?

For those people it is not possible to identify themselves with social goals any more of course – in a sense they veer out of the system They will – like I hinted a few moments ago – want to retreat into other dimensions of physical existence – back then they were commonly known as the wise masters in the mountains of the Himalaya or the “white fraternity”.

Why, they could also proclaim their own prophecies!

No they can’t especially not if they have really understood the deeper coherences. If they did they would be going in circles again.

I don’t understand!

To have a message is only yet another part of our little game that wants to be the better offer out of all the other games. All of those healing systems and healing doctrines are part of an egoistic game in a world of imbalance where it is all about finding and keeping the holy grale.

Ah ... I think I am slowly beginning to understand! There is no God that would embrace us, no paradise waiting for us – only the unknown behind the mirror of our images that we cannot avoid. To leave this game would mean to leave all the healing systems and religious doctrines behind and abandon all collective constructions no matter where it may lead to in the end or where the journey is going?

Yes, in the end we will leave everything behind regardless of how casually we are persuing our goals. As long as you have an aim, which seems worth achieving for you, you are bound to our models, and that is why it is good for people not to study their own created images of truth too closely. The truth shows no refuge where you can go to so one could escape from our structures, for the structure is the opposite of the deeper truth, but it is also – and this is important to know – a part of our own, human truth.

One last question: What is the wise man doing seen from a spiritual point of view?

He is fusing with God ...

... the very God that is only an image in peoples heads?

Exactly with that one! God is a swirling entity, a divine blister that emanates everything visible in the universe, and devours it again. In fact it is the pure energy of creation which throbs in the middle of the universe surrounded by star systems. Somehow all religious models are more or less the pictured description of the big bang, the first impulse that brought everything into being on this day zero, on which, in a manner of speaking, God gave birth to his own energy, though without being ever separated from it. Since then he is floating on the crests of the eternally expanding universe, within everything he created – deeper and deeper into the depths of eternity. Or if we express it a bit less veiled: Since then the force is a part of its own justification and penetrates through all its creations.

I think I’m beginning to understand what you are trying to tell me:According to your description God would be a kind of “silver–surfer” on the midnight sky ...?

The problem with divine spheres is that we can’t trust the inner, spiritual part of ourselves, because we have learned that everything we feel has to be cataloged and classified. As a result our mind gets twisted in the crucial moment when we are being called from within to follow the emanation, and we feel forced to interpret this feeling. But our intellect projects the inner sensing which developed out of our intuition onto an outer representative, whom we can worship, so that he can help us to fight against evil. On the other hand the journey into the deep sources of truth has its price. If we want to have a glimpse behind the delusions of our imprinted world images who force us to observe only what has been collectively naturalized, our enforced image of the world breaks apart. Only because of these networks which we have set up within our perception in the course of history and which we have passed on from generation to generation, we are bound to the same dream and only because of these collective memories, which provide the banisters onto which we can hold on to and safely move hand over hand through the unknown if we don’t get engulfed by the eye of God ...

... or is it an old form of conditioning to the picture of the wonderful Wizard of Oz?

In other words: as long as we refuse to see through the mechanisms that force us to perceive the world in the way we have learned to observe it and keep it functioning, we are safe from the eye that sees everything. Therefore there is never an end to what leads us further on: That what always causes new circles to spread on the waters of higher frequencies like a stone, that was flung into the water is the sum of the emanations of the eye, which eternally expands into the cosmic depths always creating new galaxies – a kind of cosmic uterine orifice that sucks in everything and flings it out again when it has reached the end of its cycle because of its air gulping and excreting nature to bear the inimitability of every creation into the light of the ever changing spots and let each of them be interpreted differently. Therefore we remain eternal dreamers of divine materializations of the cosmic sight at least as long as we don’t learn to “see with our heart” – as long as we don’t recognize that we are not only participants but also the creators of our life.

Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.