  ,   
 


    ,   ?       ,   ?         ?

      ,     .          ,         .         ,           .

    ,     .   ,  ,        .





 

  ,   





  ,   

    ,        

 







 1.     ,   

 2.     -

 3. ,    

 4.      

 5.     

 6.      

 7.  

 8.   .  ,   

 9.    ?

 10.    

 11.  ,   .  ,    

 12.    ,     

 13.     ,   

 14. ,     

 15. ,   




 1.     ,   



   ,   .

      .

   .

 ,     .

   ,        .       :    ,    .  ,   .      .

 ,    .

  ,    .




        


 2005        46      :         ,   .

  ,        106 .            d = 0,21.   ,    .   :     ,   ,      .

    ,         .

       .     ,      .    , ,   , ,  ,      .




    


    .

  ,  :   .

    :    .

  ,    .      .

  :

   ;

   ;

       ;

    ;

       .

     ,   .

 ,           .

 ,          .




   


     .

    .       .     .    .

   -  ,        .

  ,        ,      .

  ,       ,    ,      .

     :

1.     ;

2.       .




 


 ,   .           :    ?

  ,    :     ,   ,  ,  ,      .

  .

     ,     .     .

      .        :        ,          .     ,     .




:   


    ,     ,  ,     .

    .

    ,  ,     ,        .

  ,         ,    .

   .     .     .




 


Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038208




 


             .

       .

    ,    .    ,      ,         .




 2.     -



    .

       .

  ,       ,   .

  .

    .




    


    ,       .           :   .

             .

      ,           .

 ,    ,       .

     .                ,     .

          .

    .




   


   ,    .

  .

 .

  .

     .

       .

  .

  .

    .

  .

    .  ,   .  ,     .

     :    ,    .    ,     .




  ,   


 224 ,  245   79 722 ,           .               .

  ,            .

          .

     ,       .            ,       .    .




   


      .

 :      ?    ?    ?        ?

 :    ?   ?     ?     ?

            .

            .




:   


       .

1. :    ?

2.  :       ?

3.   :       ?

4. : , , , ,  ?

5.  :       ?

    .  ,    .

        .      ,      .    ,      ,    .




 


Fraley, R. C., Roisman, G. I., Booth-LaForce, C., Owen, M. T., & Holland, A. S. (2019). The development of adult attachment styles: Four lessons. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.008

Zhang, X., Li, J., Xie, F., Chen, X., Xu, W., & Hudson, N. W. (2022). The relationship between adult attachment and mental health: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(5), 10891137. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000437




 


      .

  ,        ,   .

  ,      ,       .




 3. ,    



    ,   .

    ,   .

    ,  - .

       .




     ,     


        .   ,     ,         .

    .

        ,    .     ,    .     .

             ,     .

  .

   ,    ,     .  :     ,      .




   


,       .

     ,      .

  .

 :     .

   .    .

      :

   ,      ?

     .      ,     .




      


        .

   ,  ,   .      :      ,          .

-      .

      :

,   .

     .  ,  ?

 .

         .          ,    .      ,    .




    


      .

     .

   :

       ;

     ;

      ;

    ;

    .

     . ,      .     :     ,    .         .




:   


    ,   ,     .

1. .       .

2. .    ,   .

3. .     .

  :      ?

  :   ?      ?

           .




 


Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy.

Crasta, D., Rogge, R. D., Maniaci, M. R., & Reis, H. T. (2021). Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness. Psychological Assessment, 33(4), 338355. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000986

Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228




 


    .

Ÿ    ,    ,       .

   ,     .  ,   ,       .




 4.      



  .

 .

     .

  .

 .

     .

      ,   ,    .




   


    ,     .      .

            , ,        : , , .

              .         ,    :   ,    ,   .

  ,     .       .  ,      .




    


   .

     ,      .

      .

      .

   ,     .            .




  


     .

 ?

     , , .

  ?

    ,  .     ,        .

   ?

   ?    ?   ?

 ?

     .

:       .   ,      .         ?




 


         .  ,       .

    :

    ,   .

 .    ,                .

     .  ,      .             .




:  


      :

1. ;

2.    ;

3. .

     ,  ,    .      ?

    .       ,     .

     . ,      .




 


Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 333.

Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1988). The impact of attributions in marriage: Empirical and conceptual foundations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 7790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00755.x




 


       ,        .

  ,    ,  .

  ,    ,     .




 5.     



   .

       .

  :   .

        .




,         


   : , , , ,  .

     .

   ,     ,  ,    .     ,    .

 ,        .

 ,     .  ,  ?     .




   


       ,     .        ,    .

  .

   .

           .

   .     .

    ,  ,     ,      .  ,   ,   .




    


    .     ,       .

    .

     .     .

:

 .

     ,     .           ?

           .




  


     ,    .

      .      .     .




  .


   .

   ,     (https://www.litres.ru/book/eniia-agnis-34048982/zhenshchiny-koshki-muzhchiny-sobaki-74625109/)  .

      Visa, MasterCard, Maestro,    ,   ,     ,  PayPal, WebMoney, ., QIWI ,       .


