John Knox and the Reformation

247

The Teviotdale Ormistouns of that ilk.

248

In Pitcairn’s Criminal Trials is Arran’s report of Bothwell’s very words, vol. i., part 2, pp. 462-465.

249

Bain, i. 613, 614.

250

Bain, i. 618, 619.

251

Knox, ii. 330.

252

Ibid., ii. 330, 331.

253

Cf. Baird, The Rise of the Huguenots, ii. 21 et seq.

254

Bain, i. 627. Randolph to Cecil, May 29.

255

Cf. Froude, vi. 547-565.

256

“Book of Discipline,” Knox, ii. 228.

257

M‘Crie, 187.

258

Knox, ii. 330-335.

259

Bain, i. 673.

260

Randolph mentions the joy of the Court over some Guisian successes against the Huguenots, then up in arms, while Mary was on her expedition against Huntly, in October 1562. On December 30 he says that there is little dancing, less because of Knox’s sermons than on account of bad news from France. Bain, i. 658, 674.

Dr. Hay Fleming dates the wicked dance in December 1562, but of course that date was not the moment when “persecution was begun again in France,” nor would Mary be skipping in December for joy over letters of the previous March. Mary Queen of Scots, 275.

261

Knox, vi. 140, 141.

262

Keith, iii. 50, 51.

263

Bain, i. 630.

264

Lesley, ii. 468.

265

Knox, vi. 193.

266

Knox, ii. 337-345.

267

Hay Fleming, Mary Queen of Scots, 301.

268

Knox, ii. 347.

269

Act Parl. Scot., ii. 572.

270

Bain, i. 665.

271

Bain, i. 668.

272

Chalmers, in his Life of Queen Mary, vol. i. 78-96 (1818), takes the view of the Huntly affair which we adopt, but, observing the quietly obtained title of Moray under the Privy Seal (January 30, 1561-62) and the publicly assumed title of Mar, granted on February 7, 1561-62, Chalmers (mistaking Huntly for a loyal man) denounces the treachery of Lord James and the “credulity” of the Queen. To myself it appears that brother and sister were equally deep in the scheme for exalting Moray and destroying Huntly.

273

Cf. Pollen, Papal Negotiations, 163, 164.

274

Knox, ii. 346.

275

Ibid., ii. 358.

276

Bain, i. 675.

277

Froude, ii. 144 (1863).

278

Registrum de Panmure, i. – xxxii., cited by Maxwell; Old Dundee, 162. Book of the Universal Kirk, 26.

279

Knox, ii. 364-367; ii. 531, 532; Keith, iii. 140, 141.

280

Spanish Calendar, i. 314.

281

Bain, i. 684-686.

282

Knox, ii. 367-369.

283

Knox, ii, 370.

284

Bain, i. 686.

285

Ibid., i. 687.

286

Knox, li. 361; Bain, i. 693. Lethington’s argument against Lennox’s claim, March 28, 1563.

287

Knox, ii. 371.

288

Bain, ii. 7.

289

Knox, ii. 370-377.

290

Ibid., ii. 377-379.

291

Bain, ii. 9, 10.

292

Knox, ii. 381.

293

Ibid., ii. 387-389.

294

Bain, ii. 24.

295

Ibid., ii. 25.

296

Spanish Calendar, i. 338.

297

Bain, ii. 19, 20.

298

Bain, ii. 26; Knox, ii. 393, 394.

299

Hume Brown, Scotland under Queen Mary, p. 99.

300

Pitcairn, Criminal Trials, i. 434.

301

Dr. M‘Crie accepts, like Keith, a story of Spottiswoode’s not elsewhere found (M‘Crie, 204), but innocently remarks that, as to the brawl in chapel, Spottiswoode could not know the facts so well as Knox! (p. 210). Certainly twenty-two attendants on the Mass were “impanelled” for trial for their religious misdemeanour. Knox, ii. 394, note I.

302

Knox, ii. 397.

303

Randolph to Cecil; Bain, ii. 28, 29.

304

Knox, ii. 399-401.

305

Keith, ii. 210. The version in Bain, ii. 30, is differently worded.

306

Knox, ii. 403.

307

Knox, ii. 399-415.

308

Pitcairn, Criminal Trials, i. 434, 435.

309

Randolph, December 31; Bain, ii. 33; Knox, ii. 415.

310

Randolph, February 19, 1564; Bain, i. 113, 125.

311

Knox, ii. 415, note 3.

312

Knox, ii. 417-419.

313

Bain, i. 680; ii. 54.

314

Knox, ii. 291, 292.

315

Lethington spoke merely of “controversies” (Knox, ii. 460). I give the confessed meaning of the controversy.

316

Compare Knox, ii. 291, as to the discussion at Makgill’s house in November 1561.

317

Knox, ii. 460, 461.

318

Original Letters, Parker Society, Bullinger to Calvin, March 26, 1554, pp. 744-747.

319

Knox, ii. 441, 442.

320

The very programme of the General Assembly for the treatment of Catholics, in November 1572. See p. 269 infra.

321

Knox, v. 462-464.

322

Knox, ii. 441.

323

Ibid., ii. 442, 443.

324

Randolph to Cecil, February 27, 1565; Bain, ii. 128.

325

Knox, ii. 497.

326

Ibid., vi. 224, 225.

327

Knox, vi. 273; ii. 499.

328

Ibid., ii. 514.

329

Ibid., vi. 402.

330

Book of the Universal Kirk, 34.

331

Knox, vi. 416.

332

Bain, ii. 254, 255.

333

Stevenson, Selections, 153-159.

334

Papal Negotiations, xxxviii. – xliii.

335

Keith, ii. 412-413.

336

Knox, ii. 524.

337

Knox, i. 235.

338

Hume Brown, John Knox, ii. 231.

339

Randolph to Cecil, March 21, 1566. Bain, ii. 269, 270. Diurnal, March 17, 1566. Knox’s prayer, Knox, vi. 483, 484.

340

Bain, ii. 269, 270.

341

See Calvin’s letter of January 24 or April 1, 1564, Corpus Reformatorum, xlviii. 244-249.

342

Life of Knox, 235, note 3; cf. Knox, ii. 533.

343

Burnet, History of the Reformation, iii. 360.

344

Knox, ii. 544-560.

345

Knox, vi. 545-547.

346

State Papers, Mary, Queen of Scots, vol. xiii., No. 20, MS.

347

Book of the Universal Kirk, 61-67.

348

Stevenson, Illustrations of the Reign of Queen Mary, 208.

349

Knox, ii. 563.

350

Stevenson, 221.

351

Ibid., 240, July 21.

352

Chalmers’s “Life of Mary,” ii. 487.

353

Knox, vi. 558-561.

354

If born in 1513-15, he was only about fifty-three to fifty-five.

355

Knox, vi. 567.

356

Knox and the Church of England, 230.

357

Strype’s Grindal, 168-179 (1821).

358

Corp. Ref., xlvii. 417, 418.

359

Strype’s Grindal, 507-516.

360

Zurich Letters. 1558-1602, pp. 152-155.

361

Strype’s Grindal, 180. Also the letter of Grindal in Ellis, iii. iii. 304

362

Knox, ii. 247-249.

363

Knox and the Church of England, 298-301.

364

Knox, vi. 559.

365

Ibid., vi. 568.

366

M‘Crie, 248.

367

Bannatyne’s Memorials, 5-13 (1836).

368

Calderwood, ii. 515-525.

369

Bannatyne’s Transactions, 70-82. Bannatyne was Knox’s secretary, and fragments dictated by the Reformer appear in his pages.

370

Melville’s “Diary,” 20-26.

371

Knox, vi. 606-612.

372

Bannatyne, 223, 224 (1836).

373

Knox, vi. 620-622.

374

Ibid., 236

375

Bannatyne, 268.

376

Ibid., 273.

377

Ibid., 278.

378

John Knox, ii. 282, 283.

379

Cf. Leicester’s letter of October 10, 1574, in Tytler, vii. chap, iv., and Appendix.

380

Tytler, vii. chap. iv.; Appendix xi, with letters.

381

Knox, ii. 356; Bannatyne, 281, 282.

382

Morton to Killigrew, August 5, 1573.

383

Bannatyne, 283-290.

384

There was another Falsyde.

385

See the letter in Maxwell’s Old Dundee, 399-401.

386

Bain’s Calendar is misleading here (vol. i. 202). Why Mr. Bain summarised wrongly in 1898, what Father Stevenson had done correctly in 1863 (For. Cal. Eliz,, p. 263) is a mystery.

387

See the “Prefatio,” Knox, i. 297, 298. In this preface Knox represents the brethren as still being “unjustly persecuted by France and their faction.” The book ends with the distresses of the Protestants in November 1559, with the words, “Look upon us, O Lord, in the multitude of Thy mercies; for we are brought even to the deep of the dungeon.” —Knox, i. 473.

388

Knox, vi. 22, 23.

389

M‘Crie’s Knox, 360.

390

Knox, i. 317-319.

391

Hume Brown, John Knox, ii. 6.

392

John Knox, ii. 4.

393

Scot. Hist. Review, January 1905.

394

Lesley, ii. 40, Scottish Text Society, 1895.

395

In the French Archives MS., Angleterre, vol. xv.

396

Melville, 79 (1827).

397

Spottiswoode, i. 320.

398

Keith, i. 493, 494 (1835).

399

Angl. Reg., xvi., fol. 346.

400

Teulet, i. 407.

401

Ibid., i. 410.

402

For. Cal. Eliz., 1559-60, p. 453.

403

Ibid., p. 469.

404

Ibid., p. 480.

405

MS. Record Office; cf. For. Cal. Eliz., 1558 59, 408, 409.