- -
- 100%
- +
What about our social ambitions? Are they wrong?
They are only wrong when we believe that they are right. Our social values mirror the game humanity plays and the fact that it invents certain rules in order to have something that they can occupy themselves with while living. Common morals are nothing but a collective self-occupation-therapy, so that human beings can perform their anarchistic nature on a controlled stage.
Why then all this stress, all this war and anxiety in the world?
Because our view is so narrow and dual. No one goes to war just fore the sake of war, no, we fight against each other, because the other one is always wrong and one is anxious to persuade the other one of the own justified demands. If it is necessary to enforce ones postulations, one has to use war, which of course never results from the own injustice, but from the unapologetic attitude of the other. The universal frequency is an impersonal force, neither good nor bad. Only the mechanisms of our consciousness paint them „black“ or „white“. The differentiation happens consequently in our central nervous system, in our thoughts. The former, negative descriptions of destructive forces mirror nothing else but the own, subconscious demons of mankind. The world is a mirror, in whose reflection we see the image of the others overlapped by our own demons, for which we are blind to recognize them ourselves.
Blind? But evil exists in this world – does it not?
Yes, but only because we do not know the deeper coherences of evil. Evil is mostly being constructed by numerous negative experiences, which in turn feed on personal disappointments. These disappointments result from negative experiences, from which we perceive only the mistakes of the others – not our own expectations.
Do you mean we can only see errors within the others?
Generally we do, yes.
That doesn’t sound very comforting! Where could be the solution?
We may not expect any solution to come from the outside, but we have to find it within ourselves. It is always most important to create ones own point of reference regardless of ones position, which is giving us the possibility to watch our actions from the outside point. Then we will realize very soon that a solution is not necessarily needed.
Why don’t we need a solution?
Because we are always a part of the solution! The problem is only the shadow of the resulting realization: We always see from our own perspective, the point from which we create our problems ourselves, because seen through the eyes of eternity our problems do not even exist ...
... and where does the problem exist then?
Nowhere. Every mistake is nothing but the retrospective of a realization, and the sense of all this lies within the strength not to root oneself to the position of the mistake. In other words: Mistakes are only the nebulosity of material systems, that wouldn’t exist without points of reference. Seen from a spiritual point of view they are nothing but a direction sign to realizations, helping us to perceive the operating forces of evolution, that normally are not perceptible through material thinking.
You think that injustice will remain in this world as long as we are only able to see it in others and never within ourselves?
Yes. Only the one who knows his own shadow, knows who he really is. And only the one who knows himself can conceive what it means to evolve from within oneself. For we do not only walk the tight-rope over the abyss, we are also the crocodiles lingering in the bleary waters who eat the ones who lost their balance. At least until we recognize the fact that the sinners are one part of ourselves and the crocodiles resemble the other part of the same existence.
But what about world piece?
The quest for paradise must remain an unfulfilled longing otherwise the human race has no ambition for development.
What ...? Why can’t the human race develop in piece and harmony?
A static paradise doesn’t offer enough foundations for the human ego to evolve, and therefore peace is never possible. Humanity needs war with the prospect of piece or perpetual crisis that includes the hope for paradise, which of course may not fulfil itself, so that it can serve as fundamental motivation for development.
Well I don’t know ... this sounds really brutal. Somehow I miss the term “Freedom”? What about our own, free will?
We have the freedom to do exactly that what vibrates within the collective frequency of the actual collective energy field of time, in a manner of speaking to implement a socially imprinted image of freedom within contracted, personal possibilities. It is always about “doing what has to be done”, like even Goethe knew already before our time. If we fulfil this aspiration, we perceive what leads to a conceived image of freedom.
Where does the final destination beyond our social and material aims lie?
Our origins lie within the spirit of the universe, within the unknown, and we came here to evolve – to learn about the laws of change within matter – This is about learning in what way we influence our world – To create the conditions under which we can change our reality, so we can understand the way our intellect is working. Only then can we realize that we are the ones who have to change if we want to improve the world.
b) Specific questions referring to higher realizations and human models
What do you think about the Christian image of God?
As long as we are not searching for this God deep within ourselves or in our memories but inside religious scripts, we should restrict our approach to the historical perspective of an anthropologist. Every human being hides the memory of the source of creation within his consciousness, the spiritual flame into which he wants to return. It is the longing for paradise that we repress in the course of our lives, the will to return into the blessed land, in which human beings construct their gods. Behind this however does not hide the fusion with, – and the return to – the divine origins but the egoistic claim to evolve from within oneself in a creative way and, in a sense, be godlike. The resulting conclusion is obvious: These images divert from reality – this collective God cannot help us, on the contrary, he strengthens and patronizes us in our illusion ...
... a divine phantom that – in a way – bites its own bottom?
God is an image, thought up by priests, which helps us to deal with the results of our own acquisitions. Somehow this is about assigning ourselves to the task that helps us to find God or the meaning of life within the consequences of our deeds. That is why this picture always points back to it’s creator: Humanity …
You think that mankind has created God after their example?
Sure, because we only ever see what we want to see, and we perceive everything in the world exactly the same way our collectively minted consciousness forces us to interpret the things we see, to prevent them from transgressing the borders of our common perception. Even worse: We only see the association with our collective thinking-structures, which we have evoked from within our cradle and since then differentiated and cultivated, confirmed by everything. Actually everything we see is nothing else but a brew mixed by electric impulses in our brain, that force us to relate to something so that we at least have two points between which we can navigate inside of his mechanisms. Just imagine our inner position from where we perceive the world, would displace itself, then the whole attention towards our reality would collapse, and then our whole civilization would vanish instantly.
But where is the origin of the impulse that causes the need to create such an image?
Within the collective intention itself! We form realities from within our spiritual force and our common imagination, in which we interact and therefore there’s need of an origin to which we can relate within our dual conception, so that we are not able to notice that all our images flow from within ourselves and we name this origin „God“. That’s the trick …
... the God-trick?
The collective intention is the impulse, to construct a reachable symbol from the fathomless numinous creation and place this self-created image like a mirror in front of us so that we can believe in it.
Does that mean that humanity is its own creator?
You are absolutely right! The first human beings had to – in a manner of speaking – invent their civilization first and the question, how this world could have come into being, helped them to find the answer, in the way they observed it. Our own assessment of this world out there in turn influenced the image they created from themselves, because we can only feel ourselves through our intuition, which is again initiated from the outside world. And through this perpetual interaction between the self-image and the outside world, they constructed their personal history.
The self image that reveals itself to us in our mirror helps us to trust the God who is looking back at us through the reflection?
Yes. As long as we do not realize that we ourselves are the ones who create the inventories of our symbolisms, we can not be able to see the fact that we in a way have become the filling of our own perception, and on this belief we can depend on. We see ourselves standing at the windows of our cerebrum staring out at the world through our eyes, but what we see is actually nothing else than a kind of formatted landscape out of our collective inventory.
Did I understand you correctly? The all-embracing frame which holds everything together is our faith?
To define this picture as what we want it to be a frame is necessary, and this frame consists of the many individual egos, through which we force each other to keep this self created image together.
And why do we have to keep this image together? Would the world break apart if we didn’t?
It is not the world that would break apart without a frame, for such a world could never have existed. It is the construction of our ego that always builds a controlled reality, which would collapse if we would suddenly have the idea of not believing in our self constructed world image any more.
Then our models would be nothing but a farce …?
In a sense, yes. Because we don’t know that reality on the outside in the way we know it was created by our collective creativity, so we could have something within our consciousness that we constructed, which we are able to control and therefore we really believe that the outer world is completely autonomous from our inner perception ...
... and every form of searching for God is a joke?
At least one that is to be taken very seriously, for this God is in fact the self-made life-goal of humanity within our minds! Let us go back in time: At the very beginning of mankind there was no God – just a few tools of consciousness, which variated us from animals and using them we were to carve our worldview out of eternity. This wish we have fulfilled ourselves, for these self fulfilled wishes are the foundation of that what we relate to and we have expanded them into gigantic cathedrals of knowledge within which those billions of priests and scientists are busy constantly confirming and explain our monuments. Our whole progress is nothing but a development of images that we ourselves have constructed and which fulfill themselves within the collective capacity of consciousness.
But what about spiritual realization? And where would be the solution?
Maybe this is all about simply accepting the fact that the way we suffer when we proceed with the endless conflict we have with each other, is the price we have to pay for wanting to control our lives. There is no return from this hamster-wheel. Therefore there’s no point in the question what would be if it all were different. Maybe we should ask ourselves the following question: “How should we understand the problems in our world as long as we fail to notice that these problems lie within ourselves?”
So, there is no paradise?
What for? Paradise is nothing worth achieving for a human nature, foreseen from the perspective of our ego, there is nothing to strife for. Human evolution originates in social and civil control, to let the natural instincts be accompanied by a socialized pendant, and this control is the framework around which the structure of every civilization winds itself – and collapses from time to time. Therefore it makes no sense for the magical person to repress or overcome control, he rather has to study the social mechanisms closely and ask the price one has to pay for this control. Like I said before: There is no escape from this dual trap. These delusions always lead to destruction and total breakdowns, onto which new orders install themselves. This is the fundament of human development.
What about higher ambitions that human beings long for? Don’t we need a specific aim ... a deeper truth?
As long as we perpetually try to enforce clarity we are delivered victims to the force of our intellect. For as long as our intellect is only able to perceive life through the limited forms and shapes within the dimensions of our common way of perception which he can comprehend, the strife for clarity or a deeper truth is, seen from an objective point of view, the illusion to prefer our imagination to eternity and believe in it. That is why every kind of clarity is threatening to our existence, for it observes and verifies only small fractions out of a whole, isolates them and evaluates them as if they were everything. Our „controlled“ models are a trick that only works because we don’t see through it.
Why do human beings even need models?
Because we are only able to see the world the way we experience it through our structures of thought, we first of all have to get an impression of our way of thinking. Actually models are for collecting our focused thoughts around one center so that we have a common foundation that is the precondition for every kind of interaction, in a manner of speaking, a description of the world, so that we can have philosophic conversations about it …
I understand ... models that sustain reality are actually diverting from what is real?
If we were clever, we would realize that truth cannot be enforced by means of our intellect, because all that is perceivable through thinking is thinking itself, which is the very aspect we have chosen to be our major criterion, to measure itself. If we want to convince our intellect, we have to create models first that convince our thinking, and then we have to forget that we ourselves have constructed these models. That is why we may not expect any truth of these models because truth lies beyond the duality of consciousness. It is not our task to enforce a „model of truth“ but to accept that we are never able to see the truth with what our consciousness is equipped with.
According to your words every model would be an illusion that is essential for life?
Indeed: Without these structures mankind would have nothing to hold on to because as I already told you: The only thing that is perceivable through thinking is thinking itself, but these realizations only lead us to new models. Do you want to know more about this?
I want to know everything!
Every model enacts of its own, inner daemon, an energetic existence created within the model through spiritual laws that radiates negative frequencies onto beings that are not of the same opinion and keeps us captured within the specific force field. We know this concept from science, politics, religion and esoteric. The very moment a human being has understood his model he is trying to try it out on someone else’s life. Models create a collective energy, which is controllable and confirmable by accessory input from the outside. Behind this lies the egoistic intention to transform life into a generally valid structure.
This system seems familiar to me ... is there no alternative?
There is nothing beyond our structures, because these different models which mankind has created for itself in the course of history are the only path evolution will take.
Where is this path leading to?
Reality is an accumulation of conceptions – depending on the cultural sources from which mankind draws its reality. All in all this means: Models are the only instruments that are able to hold an objective lie against our subjective wickedness and this is not only the first step on the path of wisdom but it is also the most important one.
So, are we back at the good, old religion then?
All spiritual, religious, magical and esoteric models are something like a consequence of our material world. They embody the materialization of the repressed longing of the world to explain the universe from deep within and not only superficially, that is: like the human mind „imagines“ the higher goals. Have we realized this, we are ready to take our first step into the world of magic …
... first step where to? What can we do?
Nothing. It is doing it all by itself. But while doing nothing we can become conscious of certain things …
... what things?
Should we not, for example, stop looking for the devil on the outside? Through this we could prevent a good deal of suffering – because he indwells us! You yourself are your worst enemy! It is our shadow and it wants to kill us!
It wants to destroy us? I do not understand!
The devil is the separated part of humanity – and he exists in each and every one of us! As long as we know this we can rest at ease …
Rest at ease ...?
Everything we are desirous to achieve is determined by what is trying to be accomplished through and within us, so our fate can fulfill itself. This is the final realization on our path to redemption. If we knew that there never is anything to realize which is not already enclosed deep within ourselves, there would be no motive for personal development.
But when the devil indwells us?
Don’t worry – So do the Gods! Look: We are our parent’s children and our parents are their parents children, who yet again are children of their parents etc. This implies, that every one of us is related to the first human being, to the first ape, originated from the first prehistoric organic form of life – and even further back – to the very origin of creation. In other words: We include the whole universe and therefore the force of creation is a part of us. Unfortunately we lost the access to our inner power, which would let us share in the cosmic conception. That is why we have no choice but to addict ourselves to this self-made God, who kindly smiles at us from every religious institution of power, rampantly growing financial system, exaggerated constructions of prosperity and scientific explanation of spiritual topics and technological achievements ...
We have no other choice ...? What do you mean by that?
Without the systems that lead us away from spirituality and force materialism upon us in exchange, we wouldn’t be able to live at all. It is this ambivalence which frightens us so much because it mirrors our own constructed way of living. The financial markets are the most intensive shadow of the modern development, within which humanity becomes a helpless victim to its own creation. On the other hand we may not be self-pitying: We integrated this daemon into our world ourselves. Eventually it seems to be the destiny of mankind, the path that seems predetermined by the way it was constructed by evolution; therefore he will never truly find peace. And because we don’t want to be forced to confront ourselves with this truth, we constructed our religion, which diverts us from reality. What is the conclusion which we draw from this: Everything is alright, there’s no need to worry, at least as long as we are not yet confronted with our mortality or lie on our deathbed!
What would be different if we knew this?
If mankind would know the subliminal connections? The whole world would break apart from one moment to the next, because these structures are only able to exist because of our common agreement that we cannot depend on them without our control. If we further knew that it is our own control that holds this whole construction together, which yet again is the reason why we can depend on them, as long as our control mechanisms are functioning well, we can also experience that everything we believe in is nothing else then believing in our belief.
Could one not say that nothing would function without our faith ...?
We could even symbolically say that the path underneath our feet only exists, as long as our trust in the belief that this path is real, functions ...
And that we are only playing parts in our own movie?
We are not only playing the parts we are also the directors. The part of us that indwells higher spheres provides the stage on which we are not only able to orchestrate our ego but also the indescribable parts of ourselves like a director would – I shall return to this topic later. This director controls and changes the role-play and fits the ego into the reality of its environment so that the person can function within his or her life.
Who is this director?
C. G. Jung called it „self“ and defined it to be the final destination and source of our personal will, in the end a transcendent and unrecognizable inner core that simultaneously describes center and periphery.
And who is this „self“?
I can only explain it to you symbolically: “Our-self” is the will of the archer to hit the center of his target, before he actually shoots his arrow.
Why then have we not exchanged this faith of ours with a deeper, spiritual knowledge long ago? Why did we hold on to our religion for so long?
To provide the motivation to seek the meaning of life! If we knew that there is nothing to look for, that nothing matters and everything is harmonic and good the way it is, there would be no differences between us that would allow us to feel different from others and then all our goals wouldn’t make any sense.
Shouldn’t we then finally bury this old, patriarchal God of ours?
But he died long ago! These days we meet the modern separated part of his personality in the temples of science. He resembles a kind of glue which binds the collective associations of humanity onto one, firm point of reference, a founding axiom – one could call it Aristotelian thinking –, from which the whole world is measurable from behind and controllable in the front. The modern wardens of the Holy Grail, operating within their fortresses are in no way less diabolic than the old priests. They are equally addicted to their religious hubris and in their rapture they preoccupy themselves with either decoding our past using highly complicated statistics and spreadsheets of human calculation, or deliberately interfering with our gene – structures with the help of molecular-biology.
Most people think differently about this – You are no fan of science?
Most of all, I am no fan of arrogance. Mankind has a tendency to centralize its achievements and science has a tendency to proclaim its realizations the hub of the world. Thereby we shouldn’t restrict our researches to a horizontal perspective, we should most of all, fathom what lies in the deep which is to say we should not only want to find out how much we can find out, but also have the ambition to analyze the reason why we feel forced to find an answer to every question that occurs from the outside. Why do we not also try to explore our inner spheres because in the end we are all mortal beings and no scientific achievement can prevent us from facing death one day!