ETHNOS AND GLOBALIZATION: Ethnocultural Mechanisms of Disintegration of Contemporary Nations. Monograph
- -
- 100%
- +
The consequent growth of cities, professions and trade was followed by the justifiable expansion of the meaning of the term, but this expansion was an objective reflection of the increase of the population and of the influence of the social group, comprising the civil society of the time with its stratified limitations.
The beginning of the Industrial Revolution and the increase in importance of the third estate was followed by demands to recognize it as a “nation’ – that is, to grant it civil rights corresponding to its role in the life of the society. Correspondingly, bourgeois revolutions of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries removed obstacles to the expansion of the nation as a concept and as a social group, up to the size of the whole population of the state.
The final fixation of the concept of nation as a structured, culturally and psychologically integrated community of the subjects of the same state is linked to outstanding German philosopher Georg Hegel, who provided the most complete and system-like description of the sociophilosophical problem of the formation and evolution of nations among his contemporaries. In fact, Hegel introduced the very notion of the “nation’ as a basic category in sociophilosophical discourse.
The sociophilosophical doctrine of Hegel is based on the premise that historical development of humankind is predetermined by the evolution of a “global spirit’, which expresses itself through social manifestations of the “spirit of the nation’ (the “spirit of the people’).
According to Hegel, every nation is characterized by the development of the “spirit of the people’, which manifests itself in social forms and “is a certain spirit that creates an obvious, factual world, that… exists in its religion, in its cult, its customs, in its state system and its political laws, in all its institutions, in its actions and activities”.184
At the same time, Hegel’s “spirit of the people’ is a form in which the “global spirit’ can manifest itself: “Principles of spirits of a people in the necessary continuity are themselves only moments of a single united spirit, which elevates and finishes in the history through them, understanding itself and becoming all-encompassing”.185
Hegel’s “global spirit’ is reflected in history: “In global history, the idea of the spirit manifests itself in reality as a range of external forms, each of which finds its manifestation in an actively existing people. But this side of the existence is given in time as well as in space in the form of the natural existence and a special principle, typical of every global and historical people is also typical of it as a natural definitiveness.”
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
Примечания
1
Thatcher, Margaret. Statecraft: Strategies for a Changing World / Trans. M. Albina Publisher, 2003. – 504 p.
2
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. M.: Yermak, AST, 2005. – 592 p.
3
Hardt, M., Negri, A. Empire / Translation from English edited by G. V. Kamenskaya, M. S. Fetisov – M.: Praksis, 2004. – 440 p.
4
Wallerstein, I. The End of the World as we Know it: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century / Immanuel Wallerstein. M.: Logos, 2004. – 368 p.
5
Bell, D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. M.: Academia, 1999. – 956 p.
6
Giddens, A. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. M., 2004. – 340 p.
7
Buzgalin, A. V., Kolganov, A. I. Global Capital. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 512 p.
8
Delyagin, M. G. Global Crisis. General Theory of Globalization. Course of Lectures. M.: Ifra-M, 2003. – 768 p.
9
Inosemtsev, V. L. Democracy: forced and desired. Successes and failures of democratization on the brink of thousand years// Voprosy filosofii. 2006. №9 – p. 34—46.
10
Utkin, А. I. New Global Order. M.: Algoritm, Eksmo, 2006. – 640 p.
11
Beck, Ulrich. Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007. – 464 p.
12
Bauman, Z. Globalization: The Human Consequences. M.: Ves Mir Publishing House, 2004. – 188 p.
13
Kissinger, H. World Order. New York: Penguin Press, 2014.
14
Martin, H-P., Schumann, H. The Global Trap: Globalization and the Assault on Prosperity and Democracy. Translation / Zapadnya globalizatsii: ataka na protsvetanie i demokratiyu – M.: Al’pina, 2001. – 335 p.
15
Stryker, R. Globalization and the Welfare State. M., 2004. Ч. Н. – p. 83—92.
16
Soros. G. On Globalization / O globalizatsii – M.: Praksis, 2004. – 276 p.
17
Drucker, P. Post-Capitalist Society. M., 1999. – p. 67—100.
18
Butenko, A. P. Globalization: essence and contemporary problems / Sotsialno-Gumanitarnye Znaniya. 2002. №3. – p. 3—19.
19
Delyagin, M. G. Globalization. Global Crisis and “Closing Technologies” // Transnational Processes: XXI Century. M.: Sovremennaya Ekonomika i pravo, 2004. – p. 24—51.
20
Rieger, E., Leibfried, S. Limits to Globalization: Welfare States and the World Economy. M., 2004. 4. II. p. 94—101.
21
Kara-Murza, S. G. Globalization and crisis of enlightenment// Transnational Processes XXI Century. M., 2004. – p. 291—293.
22
Kagarlitsky, B. Y. Marxism. M.: ACT, 2005. – 462 p.
23
Podzigun, I. M. Globalization as reality and problem / Philosophy. 2003. №1 – p. 5—16.
24
Pantin, V. I., Lapkin, V. V. Philosophy of historical forecast-making. Dubna: Feniks+, 2006. – 448 p.
25
Pozdnyakov, E. A. Nation, state, national interests // Voprosy ekonomiki 1994. №2 – p. 64—74.
26
Panarin, A. S. Seduction by Globalization. M., 2002. – 440 p.
27
Wallerstein, I. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. M.: Publishing House Territoriya Buduschego, 2006. – 248 p.
28
Braudel, F. Grammaire des civilisations / Grammatika tsivilizatsij – M.: Ves’ mir, 2008. – 552 p.
29
Amin, Samir. The American Ideology. M., 2005. – p. 211—219.
30
Amin, Samir. Political dimension // Globalization of Defiance. Translation. M., 2004. – p. 265—286.
31
Budanov, V. G. Methodology of synergy in post-nonclassical science and in education. PhD dissertation. M., 2007. – 56 p.
32
Kapitsa, S. P. Model of the Earth’s population growth // Success of physics. 1995. 26. №3 / Model’ rosta naseleniya Zemli // Uspekhi fizich. Nauk. 1995. №3 – p. 111—128.
33
Moiseyev, N.N.Human Being and Noosphere. M.: Nauka, 1990—p. 331
34
Panarin, A. S. Postmodernism and globalization: the project of liberation of property-owners from social and national responsibilities // Issues of Philosophy. 2003. №6 – p. 18—27.
35
Lorenz, Konrad. On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1966. Translated by Marjorie Kerr Wilson. Originally published in Austria under the title DAS SOGENANNTE BÖSE. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. Viena: Dr. G. Borotha-Schoeler Verlag, 1963, p. 263.
36
Dawkins, R. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. M: Astrel’, 2010. – 512 p.
37
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. Genes, Peoples, and Languages. New York: North Point Press, 2000. – 267 р.
38
Gil-White F. J. How thick is blood? // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1999. №22 (5) – P. 789—820.
39
Geertz, C. The Interpretation of Cultures. M.: Rosspen, 2004. – 128 p.
40
Varela, F. Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1996. №4 – P. 330—349.
41
Anderson, B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. M.: Kanon Press, 2001. – 286p.
42
Gellner, E. From similarity to ethnicity // Civilizations 1997. №5 – p. 41—54.
43
Berger, P., Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. M.: Moscow Philosophy Fund: “Akademiya-Tsentr”, Isdatel’stvo “Medium”, 1995. – 334 p.
44
Barth, F. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. M: Novoye izdatel’stvo. 2006. – 286p.
45
Tishkov, V. А. Russian people as European nation and its Eurasian mission // Political Class. 2005. 5 Mая.
46
Guboglo, M. N. Identification of Identity: Articles on Ethnosociology. M.: Nauka, 2003. – 288 p.
47
Voronkov, В., Osvald, I. Introduction. Post-Soviet Ethnicity // Construction of Ethnic Community of St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin, 1998. – p. 7.
48
Shnirelman, V. A. Misfortunes of one discipline: ethnogenetic research and Stalin’s national policy // Ethnographic Review. 1993. №3 – p. 52—68.
49
Kulagin, A. A. Ethnic and religious identification of the Druze community // Historical Journal – Scientific Research. 2012. №1 – p. 141—159.
50
Drobizheva, L. M. Methodological problems of ethnosociological research// Sociological Journal. 2006. №3—4.
51
Lurye, S. V. Historical Ethnology: Coursebook for Universities. 2nd edition – M.: Aspekt Press, 1998. – 448 p.
52
Popov, Y. A. Ethnic identification in the society through language // Politics and Society. 2012. №3 – p. 104—107.
53
Nizamova, L. R. Complex concept of contemporary ethnicity: limits and possibilities of theoretical synthesis// Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2009. №1 – p. 141—159.
54
Nimayeva, B. B. Young people of Agin-Buryat Autonomous Okrug: repertoire of identitites in contemporary sociocultural context // Politics and Legislation. 2011. №9 – p. 75—81.
55
Ortobayev, V. V. Epistemological analysis of ethnosociology // Sociology in the System of Scientific Management: Materials of IV Russian Sociological Congress. M.: Sociological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012. – p. 83—92.
56
Arutyunov, S. A. Ethnogenesis, its forms and patterns // Etnopolitichesky vestnik. 1993. №1 – p. 10—19.
57
Susokolov, A. A. Structural factors of self-organization of ethnos // Races and Peoples. 1990. №20 – p. 5—39.
58
Hutchinson, J., Smith, A. D. (eds.) Ethnicity. Oxford Readers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. – p. 29—34.
59
Hale, H. E. Bashkortostan: the logic of ethnic machine politics and the consolidation of democracy // Timothy J. C., Hough J. F. (eds.) Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1993. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1998. – p. 47—55.
60
Avksentyev, V. A. Northern Caucauses: Repolitization of Ethnicity and Conflictological Scenarios of Development // Observer. 2006. №6 – p. 19—20.
61
Matishov, G. G., Avksentyev, V. A., Batiyev, L. V. Atlas of Sociopolitical Problems, Threats and Risks in the South of Russia, V. III. Rostov-on-Don: SKNTS VSH Publishing House, 2008. – 176 p.
62
Abdulatipov, R. G. Russian Nation: Ethnonational and Civil Identity of the Russians in the Contemporary Context. M.: Novaya Kniga, 2005. – 472 p.
63
Gasanov, M. R. Paleo-Caucasus Ethnic Community and the Issue of Dagestan Peoples’ Origins. Mahachkala: Dagestan State Pedagogical University Publishing House, 1994. – 194 p.
64
Gadzhiyev, K. S. Ethnonational and Geopolitical Identity of the Caucasus. Saabrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing. 2011. – 531 p.
65
Markedonov, S. M. Ethnonational and Religious Factors in Sociopolitical Life of the Caucasus Region. M.: Maks Press, 2005. – 379 p.
66
Tishkov, V. А. On phenomen of ethnicity // Ethnographic Review. 1997. №3 – p. 3—21.
67
Tkhagapsoyev, Х. Political scientists’ keen interest in the Caucasusу // Kabardino-Balkarskaya Pravda. 2010. Feb. 6.
68
Chernous, V. V. Increase in importance of ethnocentrism on the cusp of the first decade of the XXI century as consequence of imitational modernization of Northern Caucasus // Collection of Materials and Reports of III International Scientific and Applicability Conference “Caucasus – Our Home” (September 29—October 2, 2011, Rostov-on-Don) / Edited by Y. G. Volkov. Rostov-on-Don: Sotsialno-Gumanitarnye Znaniya, 2011. – p. 25—30.
69
Denisova, G. S. Southern Russian identity in the context of administrative reorganization of the macro-region // Sociology in the System of Scientific Management: Materials of IV Russian Sociological Congress. M.: Sociological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012. – p. 48—52.
70
Zhade, Z. A. Structure of multilevel identity of the population of the Republic of Adygea // Sociology in the System of Scientific Management: Materials of IV Russian Sociological Congress. M.: Sociological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012. – p. 74—83.
71
Sampiyev, I. M. СаMоопределение народов: теория и онтология. Rostov-on-Don: SKNTS VSH Publishing House, 2004. – 152 p.
72
Khoperskaya, L. L., Kharchenko, V. A. Local Interethnic Conflicts in the South of Russia: 2000—2005. Rostov-on-Don: YNTS RAN Publishing House, 2005. – 164 p.
73
Khunagov, R. D. Russian identity in contemporary Northern Caucasus’ society// Sociology in the System of Scientific Management: Materials of IV Russian Sociological Congress. M.: Sociological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012. – p. 62—68.
74
Tsutsiyev, А. А. Atlas of Ethnopolitical History of Caucasus (1774—2004). M.: Evropa, 2006. – 128 p.
75
Shadzhe, A. Y. Coexistence of identities in Northern Caucasus // Sociology in the System of Scientific Management: Materials of Russian Sociological Congress. M.: Sociological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012. – p. 120—127.
76
Shakhbanova, M. M. Ethnic identity of Ando-Tsezic group (based on results of sociological research) // Scientific Problems of Humanitarian Research. 2011. №6 – p. 54—62.
77
Safonov, A. L. Axial Age 2: return to origins or descent into darkness? // Vestnik Buryatskogo Universiteta. Issue 14 (Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, Culturology) – Ulan-Ude, 2012. – p. 34—42.
78
Davidson, A. B. Cecil Rhodes and his Time. – M.: Mysl’, 1984. – 367 p.
79
Vladimir Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Pluto Press,1996, 192 p.
80
Karl Kautsky. Ultra-Imperialism. Die Neue Zeit, September 1914.
81
Hobson, J. A. Imperialism. A Study. – London: Nisbet, 1902. – 400 p.
82
Davidson, A. B. Cecil Rhodes and His Time – M.: Mysl’, 1984. – 367 p.
83
Braudel, F. Grammaire des Civilisations. – M.: Ves’ mir, 2008. – 552 p.
84
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. M.: Yermak, ACT, 2005. – 592 p.
85
Beck, Ulrich. 60. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. – 384 p.
86
Berger, Peter, Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality // Translated by E. Rutkevich. M.: Nauka, 1995. – 342 p.
87
Huntington, Samuel. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order // Translated by P. Velimeyev. M.: AST, AST Moskva, 2006. – 571 p.
88
Granin, Y. D. Ethnoses, Nation State and Formation of the Russian Nation. Experience of Philosophical and Methodological Research. M.: IF RAN, 2007. – 167 p.
89
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society. M., 1999. – p. 492—505.
90
McLuhan, M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man / Mаршалл Mаклюэн. M.: Akademich. Proyekt: Fond “Mir”, 2005. – 496 p.
91
Soros, G. On Globalization. M.: Praksis, 2004. – 276 p.
92
Stiglitz, J. World in the last decade of the twentieth century // Transnational Processes: Twenty-First Century. M., 2004. – p. 19—23.
93
Bratimov, O. V. Reality of Globalization: Games and Rules of the New Era / O. V. Bratimov, Y. M. Gorsky, M. G. Delyagin, A. A. Kovalenko. M.: INFRA-M, 2000. – 344 p.
94
Utkin, А. I. Globalization: Process and Interpretation. M.: Logos, 2001. – 254 p.
95
Chumakov, A. N. Globalization. Limits of Whole World. M.: Prospekt, 2005. – 432 p.
96
Chumakov, A. N. Metaphysics of Globalization. Cultural-Civilizational Context. M.: Kanon+, ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”, 2006. – 516 p.
97
Buzgalin, A. V., Kolganov, A. I. Global Capital. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 512 p.
98
Delyagin, M. G. Global Crisis. General Theory of Globalization. Course of Lectures. M.: Ifra-M, 2003. – 768 p.
99
Delyagin, M. G. Globalization. Global crisis and “closing technologies” // Transnational Processes: XXI Century. M.: Sovremennaya Ekonomika i pravo, 2004. – p. 24—51.
100
Inozemtsev, V. L. Democracy: forced and desired. Successes and failures of democratization on the brink of a thousand years // Issues of Philosophy. 2006. №9 – p. 34—46.
101
Subetto, A. I. Capitalocracy and Global Imperialism. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2009. – 572 p.
102
Utkin, А. I. New Global Order. M.: Algoritm, Eksmo, 2006. – 640 p.
103
Beck, Ulrich. Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007. – 464 p.
104
Bauman, Z. Globalization: The Human Consequences. M.: Ves Mir Publishing House, 2004. – 188 p.
105
Stryker, R. Globalization and the Welfare State. M., 2004. C. N. – p. 83—92.
106
Drucker, P. Post-Capitalist Society. M., 1999. – p. 67—100.
107
Butenko, A. P. Globalization: essence and contemporary problems / А. П. Butenko // Sotsialno-Gumanitarnye Znaniya. 2002. №3 – p. 3—19.
108
Rieger, E., Leibfried, S. Limits to Globalization: Welfare States and the World Economy. M., 2004. 4. II. – p. 94—101.
109
Podzigun, I. M. Globalization as reality and problem / Philosophy. 2003. №1 – p. 5—16.
110
Kara-Murza, S. G. Globalization and crisis of enlightenment // Transnational Processes XXI Century. M., 2004. – p. 291—293.
111
Karmadonov, O.A. Globalization and symbolic power // Philosophy. 2005. №5. – p. 49—56.
112
Kagarlitsky, B. Y. Marxism. M.: AST, 2005. – 462 p.
113
Pantin, V. I., Lapkin, V. V. Philosophy of Historical Forecast-Making. Dubna: Feniks+, 2006. – 448 p.
114
Panarin, A. S. Seduction by Globalization. M., 2002. – 440 p.
115
Pozdnyakov, E.A. Nation, state, national interests // Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1994. №2 – p.64—74.
116
Fernand Braudel, A History of Civilizations, New York: Penguin Books, 1993
117
Amin, Samir. The American Ideology. M., 2005. – p. 211—219.
118
Amin, Samir. Political dimension // Globalization of Defiance. Translation. M., 2004. – p. 265—286.
119
Wallerstein, I. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction – M.: Publishing House Territoriya Buduschego, 2006. – 248 p.
120
Giddens, Anthony. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping our Lives. London: Profile, 1999. Translated to Russian. M.: Ves’ mir, 2004. – 120 p.
121
Prazauskas, A. A. Ethnonationalism. Multinational state and globalization processes // Polis. 1997. №2 – p. 95—105.
122
Guseynov, A. A. Individual and nation in light of globalism // Eastern Christian Civilization and Eastern Slavic Society in the Contemporary World. M., 2001. – p. 25—33.
123
Stepin, V. S. About Types of Civilizational Development and Future Scenarios. The Time of Changes and Future Scenarios. M., 1996. – 368 p.
124
Fukuyama, Francis (1989). “The End of History?”. The National Interest (16): 3—18
125
Zinovyev, A. A. Global Anthill. M., 1994. – 448 p.
126
Safonov, A. L. Axial Age 2: return to origins or descent into darkness? // Vestnik Buryatskogo Universiteta. Issue 14 (Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, Culturology). Ulan-Ude, 2012. – p. 34—42.
127
Guseynov, A. A. Individual and nation in light of globalism // Eastern Christian Civilization and Eastern Slavic Society in the Contemporary World. M., 2001. – p. 25—33.
128
Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 vols. – London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973—1979.
129
Milton Friedman Capitalism and Freedom. The University of Chicago Press,1962
130
Popper, K. The Open Society and its Enemies. M., Feniks, Mezhdunarodny fond “Kulturnaya Initsiativa”, 1992. – 448 p.
131
Gorbachyov, M. S. My Manifesto Land. St. Petersburg: Питер, 2008. – 160 p.
132
Kondratyev, K. Y., Krapivin, V. F., Savinykh, V. P. Perspectives of Civilization Development: Multidimensional Analysis. M.: Logos, 2003. – 576 p.